This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:
You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.
To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.
Game companies use five components--four core components and one complementary one--in a 5Cs model to ensure the control and development of virtual worlds. A multidisciplinary review of the literature reveals that game companies make use of copyright, codes, creativity, and community to do this. They use the contract as a complementary component to reinforce their control over the four basic components and to compensate for the lacunae they present. In order to examine the extent to which game companies use the contract in this way, an analysis is performed of all contractual documents from a sample of 20 virtual worlds, providing evidence of general trends and emphasizing any differences between the virtual worlds in terms of the business and gaming models sought by each game company. An explanation is provided of why these contracts do not constitute a sustainable model for the game companies, given the high level of legal insecurity they present. Some basic recommendations can be made in order to improve the sustainability of the 5Cs model by modifying these contracts in such a way that they are enforceable and by matching their content with appropriate business and gaming models. This could lead to further studies aimed at providing answers to some of the intriguing issues affecting scholars and practitioners.
Ahmad, M. A., Keegan, B., Srivastava, J., Williams, D., and Contractor, N. 2009. "Mining for Gold Farmers: Automatic Detection of Deviant Players in MMOGs," in Proceedings of IEE International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (Volume 4), Vancouver, Canada, August 29-31, pp. 340-345.
Alemi, F. 2007. "An Avatar's Day in Court: A Proposal for Obtaining Relief and Resolving Disputes in Virtual World Games," UCLA Journal of Law and Technology (11:2), pp. 1-54.
Arakji, R; Y., and Lang, K. R. 2007. "Digital Consumer Networks and Producer-Consumer Collaboration: Innovation and Product Development in the Digital Entertainment Industry," in Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International International Conference on Systems Science, Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
Baldrica, J. 2007. "Mod as Heck: Frameworks for Examining Ownership Rights in User-Contributed Content to Videogames, and a More Principled Evaluation of Expressive Appropriation in User-Modified Videogame Projects," Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology (8:2), pp. 681-713.
Balkin, J. M. 2004. "Virtual Liberty: Freedom to Design and Freedom to Play in Virtual Worlds," Virginia Law Review (90:8), pp. 2043-2098.
Balkin, J. M. 2006. "Law and Liberty in Virtual Worlds," in The State of Play: Laws, Games and Virtual Worlds, J. M. Balkin and B. S. Noveck (eds.), New York: New York University Press, pp. 86-117.
Barfield, W. 2006. "Intellectual Property Rights in Virtual Environments: Considering the Rights of Owners, Programmers and Virtual Avatars," Akron Law Review (39:3), pp. 649-700.
Barnes, R. L. 2005. "Rediscovering Subjectivity in Contracts: Adhesion and Unconscionability," Louisiana Law Review (66:1), pp. 123-188.